|
The primary motive for requiring credit guidance is that it was believed that financial counseling might be able to steer a number of debtors towards a debt management plan instead of having them file for bankruptcy. Since the debt relief law was ratified at the urging of the credit card industry, the provision of the law requiring counseling was inserted in order to encourage more debtors to pay their bills. Not too many consumers ever have any sort of formal education when it comes to managing their money, so some credit counseling could help them down the road. There were a number of purposes for inserting financial counseling in the bankruptcy law, one of which was to provide filers with a bit of money management education that they otherwise might not get.
A recent study shows that an astounding 97% of all people who have submitted to credit assistance as required by the new law have gone on to file for debt relief. The notion that people file for debt relief because they simply don't want to pay is a myth. Many, if not most debtors file for bankruptcy because they have become victims of circumstances beyond their control. More often than not, a consumer's debt burden is caused by either an unforeseen job loss or a medical crisis, like an illness or an accident. That most people with financial problems end up applying for debt relief shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone; most people who file do so because they simply cannot pay their debts. Nobody wants to apply for bankruptcy; it hurts your credit score and makes it very difficult to borrow money, find a place to live, or even get a job. It is clear that government-madated credit guidance hasn't worked in the intended manner.
Unless Congress decides that the law is misguided, those seeking debt relief will continue to receive counseling, whether it aids them or not.
|